QuadBrand
Small teams making their own marketing visuals hit the same wall. AI tools produce good-looking images that are off-brand, and correcting them by hand costs more time than the tool saved. QuadBrand takes a brand URL, extracts the colours, fonts and logo automatically, then locks them into every generation, so output comes back on-brand and in every social size at once. It's in beta, with team workspaces, credits and billing live.
The wall small teams hit
An AI image tool will hand you something good looking in twenty seconds. It will not hand you your blue, your typeface or your logo, and it will not give you the same answer twice. So somebody opens the file and corrects it by hand, which costs more time than the tool saved.
The problem is not the quality of the generation. It is that the model has no idea who you are.
Reading a brand off its own website
QuadBrand starts from a web address. It reads the site, pulls out the colour palette, the typefaces and the logo, and keeps that as the brand rather than as a sentence in a prompt that someone has to remember to type.
Every generation after that is held to it, and comes back in each social size at once rather than as one image you then crop four times.
What is actually shipped
It is a working product rather than a demo. Sign in and shared workspaces, so a team works from one brand instead of each person keeping a private version of it. Credits, metered per generation. Billing through Paystack. A library that keeps what has been made, and analytics on what is being made. A public API with its own documentation, a referral scheme and a changelog.
Generation runs against several model providers rather than one. No single provider is best at everything, and being tied to one is a business risk before it is a technical one.
What it is not yet
It is in beta and the site says so. Six core features are shipped, and what is coming is in a public changelog rather than in a deck.
This one is mine, like QuadERP, which is why it carries an internal badge. I show it because building the thing I sell is the most honest demonstration I have. The same person chose the stack, wrote the billing and has to answer for it when it breaks.
Where it stands Core features shipped
Want the same thing done properly?
Tell me what you are building and what is in your way. I will tell you what it takes, in plain numbers, before you commit to anything.
Start a conversation